Types of Wastewater Treatment Technologies
- Team Banka Bio
- Apr 25
- 2 min read
India generates over 72 billion liters of wastewater daily, yet only a fraction is treated before being released into the environment. To address this gap, selecting the right wastewater treatment technology is critical, both for ensuring regulatory compliance and achieving long-term water sustainability.
But with so many wastewater treatment methods available, how do you choose the right one? Here’s a quick guide to the most common sewage treatment plant (STP) technologies used in India, their pros, cons, and suitability.
1. Activated Sludge Process (ASP)
How it works: A biological process where microorganisms break down organic matter in aeration tanks, followed by sedimentation in clarifiers.
Pros:
Proven and widely used
Simple operation for large volumes
Low initial capital expenditure (CapEx)
Cons:
Requires a large space (footprint)
Moderate effluent quality—needs polishing for reuse
Odour issues if not properly maintained
Best for: Municipal STPs, large industrial setups
2. Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor (MBBR)
How it works: Uses free-floating plastic carriers in aeration tanks for biofilm growth, enhancing treatment efficiency.
Pros:
Smaller footprint compared to ASP
Handles variable loads better
Lower sludge production
Cons:
Requires proper carrier management
Moderate energy consumption for aeration
Best for: Commercial complexes, mid-sized industries
3. Membrane Bioreactor (MBR)
How it works: Combines biological treatment with membrane filtration (ultrafiltration or microfiltration), ensuring high-quality treated water.
Pros:
Compact (30–50% smaller footprint than ASP)
High effluent quality (removes BOD, TSS, pathogens)
Suitable for treated water reuse (gardening, flushing)
Cons:
Higher CapEx and energy consumption
Requires skilled operation and membrane maintenance
Best for: Housing societies, commercial campuses, IT parks, and hotels where water reuse is key.
4. Sequential Batch Reactor (SBR)
How it works: A time-based batch process where aeration, settling, and decanting happen in the same tank sequentially.
Pros:
Flexible operation for varying loads
Compact design
Can achieve high effluent standards
Cons:
Requires precise timing and automation
Skilled operators are needed for optimal performance
Best for: Hotels, hospitals, mid-sized industries
Comparison of Wastewater Treatment Technologies
Feature | ASP | MBBR | MBR | SBR |
Process Type | Aeration + Settling | Biofilm + Aeration | Bio + Membrane Filtration | Time-sequenced batch process |
Footprint | Large | Medium | Compact (30–50% smaller) | Medium to Large |
Effluent Quality | Moderate (needs polishing) | Good (needs polishing) | High (near potable quality) | Good (needs polishing) |
Water Reuse Capability | Limited | Suitable with polishing | High (flushing, gardening) | Medium |
Energy Consumption | Moderate | Moderate | High | Moderate |
Sludge Production | High | Low to Moderate | Low | Moderate |
O&M Complexity | Low | Medium | High (membrane care needed) | Medium to High |
CapEx (Initial Cost) | Low | Medium | High | Medium |

Choosing the Right Technology
When selecting a wastewater treatment technology, consider:
Space availability (footprint)
Effluent quality required (compliance and reuse)
Energy consumption and operating costs
Initial CapEx
Operator skill level
At Banka Bio, we help assess your site conditions, compliance needs, and reuse goals to recommend the best-fit technology for your Sewage Treatment Plant—whether retrofitting an existing STP or building a new one.
Comments